Musculoskeletal Discomfort/Sleep Disorder/Quality of Life among Hotel Room Attendants
4. The correlation between the work features and the quality of life score of room attendants
According to the “quality of life scale (WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version)”，the overall average quality of life score of the study’s room attendants (standard deviation, 95% Cl) is 56.6 (7.7, 55.9〜57.3), in which the physiological, psychological, social and environmental quality scores are respectively: 15.0 (2.1，14.8〜15.2),
13.8 (2.6, 13.6-14.0 )，14.1 (2.1, 13.9-14.3 ) and 13.7 (2.4, 13.5-13.9 ). In the various levels of the quality of life, the environmental category
has the lowest score (13.7), which is similar with the survey result that the researcher [16, 31, 32] processed focusing on workers with other occupations. The possible reason may be because the room attendants think the chemical detergent used to clean the bathroom is too much, the air does not flow that well in a confined space, like hotel buildings, some guests may smoke in the room and cause pollution, insufficient time and too much work, the salary does not meet the employee’s expectation, and lack of leisure, etc. which all show the importance the employees attached to workplace environmental health.
To save the table space, Table 4 only listed
Table 4 the correlation analysis of the study objects' work features and quality of life(category) scores(reach the significance)
work features X3 SDb Crude regression coefficient Adjusted regression coefficient1
ysc 95% CId p-valueeg 95% CId /?-valuecs
monthly work hours Environmental category quality of life score
<160 13.8 2.2 0.62 (-0.22, 1.46) 0.146 0.05 (-0.80,0.89) 0.917
160>and<180 14.2 2.2 1.06 (0.54,1.58) 0.000 0.63 (0.11,1.16) 0.018
180>and<200 13.4 2.3 0.24 (-0.34,0.81) 0.416 0.16 (-0.40, 0.72) 0.580
>200 13.2 2.5 0 0
Total seniority Social category quality of life score
<1 13.9 2.0 -0.94 (-1.80, -0.08) 0.033 -0.77 (-1.73,0.20) 0.118
l>and<6 14.0 2.1 -0.83 (-1.61,-0.04) 0.038 -0.73 (-1.57, 0.11) 0.089
6>and<l1 14.0 2.1 -0.91 (-1.76, -0.06) 0.036 -0.94 (-1.80, -0.08) 0.032
1l>and<16 14.0 1.9 -0.89 (-1.80,0.02) 0.055 -0.94 (-1.87, -0.02) 0.046
16>and<21 14.6 3.0 -0.28 (-1.41,0.86) 0.631 -0.57 (-1.71，0.58) 0.331
>21 14.9 1.8 0 0
Rest during work Physiological category quality of life score
No 14.5 2.2 -0.73 (-1.15, -0.31) 0.001 -0.44 (-0.88, -0.01) 0.045
Yes 15.2 2.0 0 0
3Mean. Standard deviation.
'Coefficients Beta. dCI= confidence interval. eUnivariate Linear Model is used to test the significance.
!The adjusted odds ratio has also controlled the age, gender, marital status, living arrangements, exercise habits, and smoking habits, n=491. gBoId items refer to/;<0.05.
383
向您推薦：收銀機 吃到飽 收銀機
該如何而對打選擇性的子宮切除？
性騷擾的定義
婦女團體之努力與民法親
子宮内避孕器
自我評量題目
與離婚登記之規定互相齟齬
Tavistock. 25-52 (1985)
第四節婚姻之住所
然阿司匹靈對胃的刺激性
由於B前我國政府根本無有關「婦女健康」
留言列表
